Fixed vs Removable Retainers and How Long to Wear Them: What the Evidence Says
A 2023 Cochrane review of 47 randomised trials (4,377 participants) found the evidence on retainers was of low to very low certainty, so it could not draw firm conclusions that any one approach to retention is better than another. In single studies, differences in tooth stability between retainer types were small, and one trial found no evidence that full-time wear of Hawley retainers gave more stability than part-time wear.
| Outcome | Removable retainer | Fixed retainer |
|---|---|---|
| Tooth stability, part-time clear plastic vs fixed (lower arch, one study) | 0.92 mm more relapse (not clinically significant) | Reference |
| Discomfort (one study) | More likely | Less likely |
| Retainer failure, part-time removable vs fixed (one study) | Less failure | More failure |
| Gum health (one study) | Better | Worse |
What the evidence found
1. The review included 47 randomised controlled trials with 4,377 participants: 8 compared removable with fixed retainers, 22 compared types of fixed retainer, 3 compared bonding materials and 16 compared types of removable retainer. Studies of aligners were excluded. 2. Without a phase of retention after successful treatment, teeth tend to relapse, that is, return to their initial position. Retention uses fixed or removable retainers. 3. Part-time clear plastic retainers in the lower arch allowed more relapse than multistrand fixed retainers in one study (0.92 mm on Little's Irregularity Index), which the review reported was not clinically significant. Removable retainers were more likely to cause discomfort, but had less retainer failure and better gum health in that study. 4. In one study, full-time clear plastic retainers in the lower arch gave no clinically significant stability benefit over fixed retainers. Participants with clear plastic retainers had better gum health but a higher risk of retainer failure. 5. Clear plastic and Hawley retainers gave similar stability in one study, but Hawley retainers had a lower risk of failure and were less comfortable at six months. 6. One study found no evidence of a difference in stability between part-time and full-time use of Hawley retainers. 7. Between types of fixed retainer, the differences in stability reported by single studies (CAD/CAM nitinol and fibre-reinforced composite versus conventional multistrand wire) were not clinically significant.
How good is the evidence?
The review judged the evidence to be low or very low certainty. Most comparisons and outcomes were evaluated in only one study, 28 of the 47 studies had a high risk of bias, and most measured outcomes after less than a year (the review focused on 12-month follow-up). The authors conclude that firm conclusions cannot be drawn about any one approach to retention over another, and call for high-quality studies that follow tooth stability for at least two years and measure how long retainers last, patient satisfaction, and side effects such as tooth decay and gum disease. This page restates that review only; its searches ran to April 2022.
Sources
Martin C, Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn D, Worthington HV, Limones A. Retention procedures for stabilising tooth position after treatment with orthodontic braces. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2023;(5):CD002283. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5 (https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002283.pub5)
Useful related pages
This page summarises published research for general information only. It is not a diagnosis, treatment plan, or substitute for advice from a registered dentist or orthodontist.
Frequently Asked Questions
Not sure where to start? Use these quick links to explore orthodontic treatments, typical costs, and helpful guides that explain what different options involve. Whether you're researching braces or clear aligners, comparing pricing, or just getting a feel for what comes next, you can browse at your own pace and come back when you're ready to request a quote.
Explore